@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 9 months agoSteam is a ticking time bombwww.spacebar.newsmessage-square153fedilinkarrow-up1111cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1111external-linkSteam is a ticking time bombwww.spacebar.news@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 9 months agomessage-square153fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish69•edit-29 months agoThis is why beehaw needs downvotes. Crappy submissions like this article that don’t make any sense Edit: OP has been spamming his nonsense across multiple communities, and has hundreds of downvotes on each of them. Except here on beehaw…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•9 months agoThank you… I was reading and thinking “this makes no sense… Does the author know what a monopoly actually is??”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•9 months agoI think it’s fair to acknowledge that everything is a trade-off, and without downvotes, we have to accept the downsides.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink10•9 months agoMight be due to my instance, but I see downvotes. Not nearly enough as it should have after reading the article though.
minus-squareBreakDeckslinkfedilinkEnglish3•9 months agofwiw, OP wrote the article himself and then spammed it to lots of different instances. Definitely worth blocking this spammer.
This is why beehaw needs downvotes. Crappy submissions like this article that don’t make any sense
Edit: OP has been spamming his nonsense across multiple communities, and has hundreds of downvotes on each of them. Except here on beehaw…
Thank you… I was reading and thinking “this makes no sense… Does the author know what a monopoly actually is??”
No, Beehaw doesn’t need downvotes.
I think it’s fair to acknowledge that everything is a trade-off, and without downvotes, we have to accept the downsides.
Might be due to my instance, but I see downvotes. Not nearly enough as it should have after reading the article though.
fwiw, OP wrote the article himself and then spammed it to lots of different instances. Definitely worth blocking this spammer.