Then, responding to those who have said he’s “only doing this for the money", Szymanski tweeted: “Yes, no fucking shit. I make games for a living. If I didn’t want to earn money from them I wouldn’t charge money for them.”

The game follows the premise of being trapped in an underwater submarine out of necessity to capture deep pictures.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Did they face significant backlash? Or is IGN just trying to “make fetch happen”? I might have just missed it.

    • AatubeOP
      link
      fedilink
      113 months ago

      Yes they did, just read the tweets linked

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Tweets do not represent significant backlash .

        Edit Significant backlash would be something like getting delisted from steam

        • AatubeOP
          link
          fedilink
          253 months ago

          A ton of people attacking the dev on Twitter is significant backlash. An earthquake does not have to cause a Tsunami to have a big effect.

        • AatubeOP
          link
          fedilink
          43 months ago

          IMO, not even visiting is very weird. Just use a blocker and steal their revenue.

          As an uninformed, I also wonder why you think IGN would make up stuff.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            25
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            They (including Musk) make money off of how ubiquitous it is, even if you’re not viewing ads. They leverage that daily view count.

            No judgement, but if you’re visiting X/Twitter, you’re supporting them. As for IGN, there’s the “too much water” controversy, but basically, they’re just way too corporate for me…

            • AatubeOP
              link
              fedilink
              13 months ago

              It’s like insisting on always paying with cash imo. Does some ethics but quite a bit of an inconvenience if you’re in a queue.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                23 months ago

                Ok yeah, you can be annoyed, but your cash example is ALSO perfectly fine if a person decides digital money isnt for them

                • AatubeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  13 months ago

                  Yeah, I get the same level of annoyed on both of these. Cheerio

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            You can’t say things like that here! We are a bunch of nerds who cling so tightly to online privacy and morals it is practically our personality!

            Nah it is weird, in the sense that most people really won’t put in that much energy to avoid a site even if it was to gather information. It’s atypical.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 months ago

      I believe it. A friend of mine raised the price of his game from free to $2 with a big update, and still kept the download for the older version free. He got all sorts of backlash, even death threats. These people are children.