I saw this post in the “celebs” community and I thought it would may interest the subscribers of the “pokies” one. (Maybe I’ve understood the “cross publication” feature in the wrong way ?)
I also do not support the AI edition of pictures of people to turn it into an erotic version. And I don’t want to contribute to it by sharing this kind of content.
In this case I want to thank @metaconnoisseur for his “authenticity checking” work. I’m leaving this post here for now. But I can remove it if I’m wrong.
It’s an AI fake. Look at the necklace, glasses contorur, the asparagus foil and the, shite de la shite, thumb, or rather lack there of.
How do you feel violating someone by making etotic content without their consent?
Edit: I may be on the wrong, as the comments below say, yet remained unconvinced.
deleted by creator
It might be altered to make nipples more visible. Which would explain some of the stuff you are mentioning but not all.
But kudos for defending consent and ethical content.
Thumbs can be bent down.
I saw this post in the “celebs” community and I thought it would may interest the subscribers of the “pokies” one. (Maybe I’ve understood the “cross publication” feature in the wrong way ?)
I also do not support the AI edition of pictures of people to turn it into an erotic version. And I don’t want to contribute to it by sharing this kind of content.
In this case I want to thank @metaconnoisseur for his “authenticity checking” work. I’m leaving this post here for now. But I can remove it if I’m wrong.