• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    496 months ago

    Anything that is made as a “collectors” item is just landfill fodder. It’s junk that isn’t worth anything. Just look at Funko Pops.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      136 months ago

      That depends on what you mean by “worth”.
      Paintings and sculptures aren’t really “worth anything” in pretty much the same way.
      What’s a movie “worth” for that matter?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        156 months ago

        Paintings and sculptures are individual artistic creations. You might be able to say such things about mass produced replicas, but not art itself.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Art itself could be considered the idea. The individual physical creation would be merely an expression of that idea. Does mass production dilute that idea or it’s “worth”?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              176 months ago

              And I think that’s our primary point of disagreement. I don’t care how scarce something is.

              In fact not quite 30min ago, I flushed something unique down the toilet because it was worthless to me. While the toilet I flush it with, is worth quite a lot to me, even though it’s very common and and found everywhere in my country. In fact if it was scarce, even unique, it might be entirely worthless.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                36 months ago

                You can disagree all you want but value is absolutely and always associated with (at least perceived) scarcity.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  96 months ago

                  Only sometimes. Not always. The value of many things comes with commonality. Social media for example would be worthless for only one person.

                • southsamurai
                  link
                  fedilink
                  46 months ago

                  I think this is a matter of terminology.

                  You’re talking monetary value/worth only. They’re talking about value and worth in a broader sense.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    16 months ago

                    Even there, something gets MORE worth when it’s used again, even to sit on a shelf and look pretty.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        136 months ago

        They’re not boring, they’re in a competition to see who can be the most self-righteous on the internet.