• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    109
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    the place I work has tried RTO policies several times now - with very limited success. well over 90% of all white collar jobs can be done from wherever you can get internet so your VPN software will function. the customer facing part of the business has to be there 100% of the time, they dont have a choice, that’s how the business model is designed. I go in a few days a week but honestly dont ever actually need to be there. maybe 2 days a month, tops, is my presence absolutely required.

    the really interesting bit, which the article didnt touch on (not much of an article to begin with) is that there is a commercial real-estate bubble. the big buildings in the downtown business district/cores of most cities, that real-estate isnt worth much if there’s no one renting the space. businesses that used to rent the space no longer need to because all of their employees work from home now. the people who invested in those big buildings are not seeing a return on their investments - and they are unhappy. that is, imho, a big driver behind the RTO movement.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      46
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      the people who invested in those big buildings are not seeing a return on their investments - and they are unhappy. that is, imho, a big driver behind the RTO movement.

      And those people are largely of the same class as the corporate executives and shareholders pushing RTO policies which ties a nice little bow on top of the whole situation. Rich people are losing money when employees work from home and so WFH has to go.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      238 months ago

      Given the housing crisis, it only makes sense to convert that real estate into residential units.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        128 months ago

        Those two are not as related as they at first seem.

        For one, the plumbing required is different, as in literally offices don’t tend to have bathrooms with toilets and showers inside every office space. Also the lighting would be cut off for all the inside units. Communal bathrooms and no windows works for work but not as good for home.

        For another, a lot of the varying housing crises (there are multiple types) relate to affordability bc of being bought up by corporate interests. Another type relates to weird zoning laws of what types of homes are allowed to be built in certain areas - and for these at least, there’s nothing stopping good homes from being made except again profits.

        So it’s not impossible, but there are challenges. Mainly, how can already rich people find a way to make even moar monay? Oh yeah and something something the poors get whatever too.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            68 months ago

            Yeah these buildings are made to have things routed under and over the floors. I keep hearing people saying plumbing is a giant problem, and it rings hollow to me, extra bathrooms are installed in homes all the time, literally just run the pipes, but seems no one wants to.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        58 months ago

        Those residential units will be worthless too if all the offices close. Why live in the big city and pay huge rents if you work remote? Just move to a cheap area and buy a nice house.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          218 months ago

          Those huge rents exist because demand exceeds supply (amongst other reasons). People want to live in walkable neighborhoods and not suburbs where you have to drive everywhere to survive.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            You can have walkable neighbourhoods without living downtown in a big city. Small villages are the original way to have walkable lifestyles. It’s how everyone lived centuries ago. There’s still plenty of those around, they just get overlooked.

            Suburbs exist mainly for the purpose of commuting into the city for work. If people stopped doing that then they could leave the suburbs.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              58 months ago

              It’s more like it’s often not a consideration, because the option doesn’t really exist. And when it does, you pay an obscene markup.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  18 months ago

                  it’s that there’s not enough space to accommodate everyone so it’s not financially realistic to most people who want to.

                  There’s plenty of space, it’s used incredibly poorly due to free parking, zoning regulations, and running highways through cities. The financial component is simply there aren’t enough of these spaces and they aren’t dense enough (and they could stand to include a lot more public and social housing, but people oppose it because they don’t want “those” people in their neighborhoods).

                  That’s not to say that reforming suburbs to make them more livable wouldn’t be a part of the solution too.

        • Mossy Feathers (She/They)
          link
          fedilink
          78 months ago

          Sadly a lot of rural areas have little to no Internet connectivity in the US because ISPs have been taking money meant for rural Internet and pocketing the money. Additionally, the internet in smaller towns can be spotty. It’s part of the reason why starlink was so hyped up when it was first announced. It’s also part of the reason why people who are allowed to work from home sometimes find it difficult to find cheaper places to live (another one being rural bigotry, though if you’re cis, straight, white and capable of pretending to be Christian, that shouldn’t be much of an issue). The cheaper the area, the worse the internet usually is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        Unfortunately only like 10% of them are viable for conversion. Office buildings and residential buildings have very different needs and it’s expensive as fuck to add all the extra shit needed for residences.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      38 months ago

      well over 90% of all white collar jobs can be done from wherever you can get internet

      This means over 90% of all white collar jobs can be outsourced/globalized. Just a matter of time unless there really is a meaningful reason to stay in the US and pay US wages.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        88 months ago

        yeah, my last job was offshored to India. from what my ex-coworkers told me, problems I could fix in a few minutes would take the new group weeks to do - and that was 6+ months after I got let go. maybe they got better but I seriously doubt it. just because a job is capable of being outsourced it doesnt necessarily mean that it’ll happen.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 months ago

          I had the same thing happen. Job got outsourced, quality tanked but they continued to outsource more departments. Like six months later they were trying to rehire everyone. Fuck that noise.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          And just because quality goes down the drain when outsourcing doesn’t necessarily mean that it won’t happen unfortunately.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              58 months ago

              Right. A big company can remain solvent for a very long time while absolutely undermining and destroying all of the things they were once great at.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          28 months ago

          My company outsourced some functions a few years ago and had hired Americans back within 2 years. Outsourcing is real but it’s also a terrible idea for anything with a high degree of accountability and knowledge. Currently there is an office/opco in Mexico (but the previous outsourcing was India) and if they need to hire but don’t have the budget for an American they’ll transfer someone to our team. But I know the Mexican office is held to decently high standards and everyone they’ve transferred to is speaka English well, and are on at approximately the same time as us since we’re all on the same continent. I like the Mexicans I work with but would like to see more Americans hired, but this is so much better than the alternative lol