• @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It’s making an image of someone that portrays them in an unrealistic and offensive context.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            68 months ago

            So if I use AI to make pornography of 50 men gang banging you, you will consider that to be on the same level as going to a carnival and getting a characture done?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Huh, you must have replied somewhat late to this - I’m sure I checked back here for any replies before I returned to my main instance for good.

              Actually, yes. If you sent it to me, that would be sexual harassment (just like if you sent me an unsolicited text description of what you want to do to me), but I don’t care what you do in private.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Ooohh, can’t wait to see us waste billions of dollars deliberating what is acceptable just like with copyright law.

      This is another law that only exists to protect rich people. Poor people can’t afford a lawyer and don’t have time to show up in court.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 months ago

        You seriously can’t see why deep fakes are a serious problem to everyone?

        This law won’t protect just rich.

        Imagine the chaos as some idiot teen creates a deep fake of some other teen in a compromising position.

        Go talk to an attorney and see what they have to say about it.