• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    88 months ago

    That’s true for all types of society. But it also means that a completely anarchist society is more stable than the rest because the means of self defence are equally distributed and that everyone would rise against such authoritarian attack.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      218 months ago

      the means of self defence are equally distributed

      That has never been, and will never be true. You could magically eliminate all weapons on the planet simultaneously and it still won’t be true, since some people are bigger and stronger than others.

      And in case you haven’t been paying attention to history; authoritarians very rarely just show up out of nowhere and take over. They are usually installed as leader after some form of revolution, then the title just gets transferred once the authoritarian system is in place. It’s usually far more insidious than just some guy the village has to band together to fight off.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        It doesn’t mean that every person has equal ability to physically defend themselves, but that society has the mechanisms to defend everyone that is being attacked. A grandma doesn’t need to be able to self defend against a thug in the street if the people nearby do it for her.

        The second paragraph is not relevant as there are no historical examples of a dictator getting into power from within an anarchist society.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 months ago

          Are there any historical examples of a large-scale anarchist society in the first place?