My take on this is no they don’t. As long as they are truthful they only report on the quality of the product and prevent many people of spending a lot of money from losing it by buying something that doesn’t work.

If your product is shit your company does not deserve to be shielded from the backlash, this is the core of (classic) capitalism after all.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    67 months ago

    Ok? “Caring about companies” only means “caring about your job and income and benefits” it doesn’t mean “I wonder if the CEO is happy”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        I care that my company continues to exist and does not experience financial hardship that will impact my income.

        How is this hard for people?

        • Hominine
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Consideration is required; it’s much easier to be a knee-jerk contrarian one supposes.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Because it’s the equivalent of saying society should not stop using coal or fossil fuels or those people who pump your gas for you because “what about the employees???”. No, the world needs to move on.

          If your company produces shitty products that people don’t want, then they shouldn’t exist and you should find a different job rather investing your livelihood in such a bad idea.