An Israeli missile has hit Iran, two US officials have told the BBC’s US partner CBS News.
Iranian state media is reporting that flights have been suspended over several cities, according to Associated Press.
Iran has been on high alert after Israel said it would respond to an Iranian attack against it on Saturday night
The US is Israel’s shield… Israel can only afford to be a belligerent bully bombing embassies because nobody wants to get involved in a war with the US. The US is enabling Israel’s worst behaviors.
I have no idea what this image means.
I’ll take a stab. The picture implies that the Durstley’s enabled the bullying of their son.
You’re right. Before this protection, they tried several times to wipe Israel off the map.
Nope, they didn’t. Even the expression itself is the result of a deliberate mistranslation by pro-Israeli propagandists trying to bolster the completely bogus victim narrative of by far the most militarily powerful and active country in the region.
Hmm, Iran calls for it constantly. Syria, Lebanon, Egypt, and Jordan tried several times. You can’t just pretend history didn’t happen.
Do you have a credible source on that? Because propagandists keep claiming that without backing it up with actual evidence that they’re not just making up whatever fits their narrative
None of them anywhere near successfully and none of them in this millennium.
And you can’t just greatly exaggerate decades old events and pretend that they represent an imminent and existential threat.
I mean, you obviously CAN, since you just did, but you really shouldn’t.
Turns out Wikipedia has a great article on it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calls_for_the_destruction_of_Israel#:~:text=Ali Khamenei%2C Iran’s supreme leader,of Israel from the region”.
I recommend checking the sources to verify it yourself.
Of course they were not successful, otherwise they would have wiped Israel off the map like their intended goal was. Also, your claim of not in this millennium is disingenuous. There are still plenty people alive to thought in those wars on both sides.
I> mean, you obviously CAN, since you just did, but you really shouldn’t.
I didn’t, that was you doing that. I was simply adding context to the person I was replying to.
Do you have any idea how biased an article has to be for Wikipedia to put that banner at the top of the article itself rather than just a section or somewhere on the talk page?
What kind of nonsense is that? By that standard, the Balkan war is still ongoing 🤦
If by “adding context” you mean “repeating deliberately misleading to downright fraudulent propaganda slogans”, sure.
Any information that doesn’t follow your narrative is misinformation huh? That’s the tactic you’re going with to hide your own misinformation?
Those wars happened, those countries wanted to wipe Israel off the map. The US negotiated with them and gave most of them money to stop trying to destroy Israel. How about actually knowing history Instead of trying to come up with your own?
The projection is strong with this one 🤦
That doesn’t allow Israel to slaughter Gazan civilians.
Just because I won’t shed a tear when the genocidal fascist Netanyahu dies doesn’t mean that he has a right to murder me, my family, all my neighbors and all the neighbors of my family.
Bullshit. The US hasn’t negotiated in good faith with a Palestinian leader since the 90s at the latest.
And even if they had, it wouldn’t matter since it wouldn’t stop the apartheid conditions and constant bombing that give the terrorists influence and therefore power in the first place.
You first, genocide apologist.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ahmadenijads-most-memorable-quotes-flna6C10331091
An 11 year old article quoting deliberate mistranslations of the then prime minister does not an imminent, constant, and permanent threat make.
I’d say “nice try”, but that would be a lie.
How about providing a source about that mistranslation?
How about five?
New York Times
Washington Post
The Guardian
New Statesman
Fair.org