• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    18 months ago

    Can you please elaborate on the technical details of the failures? What was the hidden dependency?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      The ISP had redundant electrical grid connections for reliability, but the two connections were not isolated at the electrical utility level. A failure in one substation cascaded to the other substation. The operation of one electrical feed depended on the operation of the other, so they were effectively only a single feed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        But I don’t understand why them being connected makes one dependent on the other, unless half of the supply alone can’t support the workload. What is the “electrical utility level”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          Both substations feed in parallel. Demand exceeded the capacity of station 2 to supply demand and it tripped the cutout. Only rural connections are radial. Electrical utility starts at the point of demarcation to the generators that make the power.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          The “utility level” is Madison Gas & Electric’s infrastructure. Our ISP had two independent electrical service connections based on the idea that if one went down, they’d still get power sufficient to run their data center from the other. That would be the case if each connection reached all the way to the generating station completely independently. However, the two substations to which the ISP was connected were linked in such a way that a catastrophic failure of one caused failure of the other, so it got no electrical power.