• Home Assistant is now part of the Open Home Foundation, a non-profit aiming to fight against surveillance capitalism and offer privacy, choice, and sustainability.
  • The foundation will own and govern all Home Assistant entities, including the cloud, and has plans for new hardware and AI integration.
  • Home Assistant aims to become a mainstream smart home option with a focus on privacy and user control, while also expanding partnerships and certifications.
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      For others, beware that in a docker, each plugin needs its own docker container.

      I run everything in docker except for HA which I run in a VM (HaOS) which makes it super easy to use.

      Edit: by plugins I meant add-ons

      • funkajunk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        118 months ago

        each plugin needs its own docker container.

        What are you talking about? This is simply not true.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          178 months ago

          No it’s true. I run ha in a docker container too, and it doesn’t support the plugin supervisor at all. You have to spin up your own plugin containers manually and configure the connection to them in the core ha instance, that’s what I did with piper/wyoming. I’d be happy to share a compose file if someone wants it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            78 months ago

            You don’t need a supervisor with docker. And you don’t need separate containers for plugins.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              If you’re running HA in a docker, you need to run additional containers for add-ons. This is called out in the docs. Add-ons are only for HA OS or if you install it natively, with the supervisor (HA Supervised).

              If you are willing to dedicate a device to just HA you don’t need separate containers for the add-ons. For ease of use that makes a lot of sense, it’s, pretty plug and play.

              Personally the Pi I’m running it on can handle a lot more than just HA so a docker makes more sense, and just have the add-ons I’m using also defined in the docker compose file.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                38 months ago

                So, add-ons, not plugins. You don’t need add-ons if you are not using HA OS, they’re irrelevant.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            I’d be interested to see that file if you’re still willing. IMO separating everything into their own containers is a positive.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              This is how I have mine set up:

              homeassistant: image: ghcr.io/home-assistant/home-assistant:stable container_name: homeassistant volumes: - /data/homeassistant:/config - /etc/localtime:/etc/localtime:ro - /run/dbus:/run/dbus:ro ports: - “127.0.0.1:8123:8123/tcp” - “127.0.0.1:1400:1400/tcp” restart: “unless-stopped” privileged: true network_mode: host

              ha-whisper: image: docker.io/rhasspy/wyoming-whisper:latest container_name: “ha-whisper” volumes: - /data/homeassistant/addons/whisper:/data command: --model base --language en --beam-size 2 restart: “unless-stopped” networks: default: ipv4_address: 172.18.0.101

              ha-piper: image: docker.io/rhasspy/wyoming-piper:latest container_name: “ha-piper” volumes: - /data/homeassistant/addons/piper:/data command: --voice en_US-lessac-medium restart: “unless-stopped” networks: default: ipv4_address: 172.18.0.102

        • JustEnoughDucks
          link
          fedilink
          English
          58 months ago

          I think the wording is off.

          Many or most add-ons need their own docker containers, that is what the add-ons are.

          Every integration does not need its own docker container.

            • JustEnoughDucks
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              There are a few add-ons that are very handy that don’t have a docker equivalent. Namely the google cloud backup.

              I also agree that you generally don’t need add-ons and hopefully if someone is running HA on docker, they don’t need them, but for a few select ones, it is “needed”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        Yeah. I ran it in docker for years and it was such a hassle compared to HAOS. The switch to VM was best decision I made regarding HA.