A sex offender convicted of making more than 1,000 indecent images of children has been banned from using any “AI creating tools” for the next five years in the first known case of its kind.

Anthony Dover, 48, was ordered by a UK court “not to use, visit or access” artificial intelligence generation tools without the prior permission of police as a condition of a sexual harm prevention order imposed in February.

The ban prohibits him from using tools such as text-to-image generators, which can make lifelike pictures based on a written command, and “nudifying” websites used to make explicit “deepfakes”.

Dover, who was given a community order and £200 fine, has also been explicitly ordered not to use Stable Diffusion software, which has reportedly been exploited by paedophiles to create hyper-realistic child sexual abuse material, according to records from a sentencing hearing at Poole magistrates court.

  • @natural_motions
    link
    English
    30
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The sexualization of children in any form is disgusting and harmful.

    Pedophiles need medical and psychological help, not encouragement in fulfilling their urges. Society should reject the sexualization of children. Full stop.

    • Scratch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      292 months ago

      I don’t know what the right answer is, but we provide substitutes for drug addicts to help them overcome their addictions. Methadone and nicotine patches come to mind.

      Is it completely inconceivable that a similar tool would help with harmful sexual desires?

      • SonnyVabitch
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 months ago

        I was listening to a podcast on moral philosophy (wouldn’t you wanna be as cool as me??), and one suggestion that’s stuck with me was the morality of, trigger warning,

        spoiler

        ‘life like child sex robots’.

        As in, would we as a society want to permit such things, knowing that they could potentially save humans from actual harm if they offer an outlet that scratches an itch? On the other hand, would they bring forth more harmful desires in a greater number of potential perpetrators, leading to even more harm?

        Anyway, I’m glad it’s not my job to contemplate such disturbing topics.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          Permit is a difficult thing. There is always someone willing to make such things profit. Yay, capitalism!I

          I have no idea where they come from but I’ve dove deep enough into the darker web to know people possess such items. I have no doubt that anyone willing to dive in pursuit of such an item would have little problem in finding one.

          I recall reading an article about the creators of the real doll and how they received such requests but refused them. They also claimed they had requests for animals which they didn’t think were serious and also refuse.

          I’m sure those exist as well and I would rather those exist than for people to harm real animals.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        The underlying behavior is the problem though. While substitutions could potentially be made available, this isn’t the same as drug addiction. The reality is that while a pedo could be satiated with a drop in replacement for a time (and possibly indefinitely), there is a very real risk that after a while they’re not satisfied with pretending and could quickly jump to the real thing in a split second. The due course, in my mind, is either modifying the depraved behavior or removing the person from society. While drug addiction can be a vice that doesn’t inflict harm on the rest of society (ie an addict is potentially able to silo their use from the rest of society), pedophilia is always a crime with a victim. The entire purpose of the situation is ensuring that no one becomes a victim of sex crimes, especially minors, and it is too great a risk to allow in any form.

        • @natural_motions
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          It also runs the risk of giving pedophiles something to form communities around wherein they reinforce the idea amongst one another that society is the one who has a problem not them.

          Additionally, in those communities it becomes more difficult to identify pictures and video of abuse to real children by muddying the water. The more sophisticated AI image generation becomes, the harder it will become for law enforcement that deals with this shit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Current mental help methods for pedophiles include acceptance of their desires as normal, just not something to act on IRL.

      It does not prohibit any fictional materials including children, nor can it make someone uninterested in children.

      By stripping away safe outlets, we may come at risk of these people increasingly turning to real CSAM, which is way more harmful.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        What do you know of the current methods. Where did this information come from? I’d really like to see it. You spoke with such knowledge, you must have the data to make it up, right?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          The approach was originally pioneered by the Prevention Project Dunkelfeld, and later adopted for a wider use in Germany, Europe and abroad.

          Studies have shown that this approach does work, which led to its widespread adoption and popularization.

          You can read details of the treatments coming out of this research here.

          Beware of the corporate greed and prepare good old Sci-hub to read sources in full text if you want to.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            i read three of the sources you provided (all of them, except the book), and the only thing you’ve said which is true is that the treatment ‘includes acceptance of their desires’ (though you have added the words ‘as normal’)

            the other two claims you’ve made, including ‘it does not prohibit any fictional materials including children’ and ‘by stripping away safe outlets we may come at risk of these people increasingly turning to real CSAM’ are your own inventions, and are not stated anywhere in the texts you have linked, in fact, they are directly refuted by both of them, because the actual prevention project recommends a combination of cognitive behavioral therapy and medication

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I specifically addressed the “current methods” part of it, as questioned.

              The second point was beyond the scope of the sources I provided, except maybe the book, but the project is in line with this as well - it does not focus on the fictional materials and does not explicitly prohibit them. It doesn’t encourage the consumption of such materials, either, so the position can be best described as “neutral”. It does, however, strongly object real CSAM.

              The latter was answered in another thread - yes, you are right about this being my speculation, as the scientific community, for all I know, currently doesn’t have data to either prove or disprove this point. But that seems likely to me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        I’m pretty sure that this is not true. I’d love to see sources.

        There was some research before the ongoing AI-panic, focusing on hentai instead. As it is as “harmless” as the AI-generated content.

        And I do recall that at the time there were voices in research making the point that the consumption of material did not have correlation with actually reducing the urges. So this seems highly unlikely.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Upon proper search, I agree I must have been too rushed in decisions as the topic of the influence of computer-generated or drawn CSAM on escalation in offending still seems to be a matter of speculations, with severe lack of sources on both sides (correct me if I’m wrong).

          Both sides draw from singular testimonials.

          Still, I will remove the notion on science. Thank you for issuing the correction.

          P.S. This paper does some job of evaluating both sides, although has its own strong bias not based on presented evidence. Still, it is useful to get some basic overview of the current state of affairs.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Current mental help methods for pedophiles include acceptance of their desires as normal, just not something to act on IRL.

        I am not aware of the research in this area although I have a minor psych background so that’s interesting and makes sense in hindsight. My understanding is that a large part of the compulsion is driven by guilt, shame, feelings of worthlessness, prior victimizations of themselves, etc. Essentially trying to gain a sense of power by taking it from those more vulnerable than them, like an abuser beating their spouse because someone at work put them down. So it makes sense to encourage a sense of power and lessen any sense of guilt and shame.

        On a side note, I can’t imagine having their name plastered everywhere does anything but trigger the compulsion to re-offend. Maybe when we advance more as a society, we can separate individuals into categories of has-offended and child-attracted, with the former being on a public danger list and the latter having frequent discreet visits by social workers and mandatory counselors, etc. To lessen the chance of offense and possibly start helping them before they get to the offense stage (those that were ever going to offend.)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      This sort of problem-solving acumen is how HIV became so widespread in Africa. Have you considered instead trying competence?

      • @natural_motions
        link
        English
        22 months ago

        Have you considered not advocating for the sexualization of children?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          You’re using sensationalist language to hide the fact that you’re the person in this conversation arguing for more aexual abuse of children, not me. I’m advocating for using drawn artwork to reduce abuse of children. You’re advocating for banning said artwork, which we know leads to more abuse of real children.

          Please stop supporting pedophilia.