FenrirIII to politics @lemmy.world • 7 months agoOpinion | The Supreme Court Has Already Botched the Trump Immunity Casewww.nytimes.commessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1209
arrow-up1209external-linkOpinion | The Supreme Court Has Already Botched the Trump Immunity Casewww.nytimes.comFenrirIII to politics @lemmy.world • 7 months agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish69•edit-27 months agoThe fact that they did not immediately respond with “No, the president doesn’t have immunity from criminal prosecution. They are not royalty.” tells us what the eventual outcome will be.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish54•7 months agoNot necessarily. They could decide they must come to that conclusion, but only after delaying long enough so the answer doesn’t matter.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•7 months agoIf they do make that decision then he could still be prosecuted while in office if reelected, which is how the system should work.
Removed by mod
The fact that they did not immediately respond with “No, the president doesn’t have immunity from criminal prosecution. They are not royalty.” tells us what the eventual outcome will be.
Not necessarily. They could decide they must come to that conclusion, but only after delaying long enough so the answer doesn’t matter.
If they do make that decision then he could still be prosecuted while in office if reelected, which is how the system should work.