• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    91 year ago

    A lot of people did use it on home computers (myself included) but the target was still businesses. XP had TV ads and colorful themes, and all that, while Windows 2000… Didn’t. (Well maybe on C-SPAN or something) And the most basic (major) edition was “Professional” instead of something like “Home” as XP had.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if some of the big box computer makers did ship with it to home users, but it wasn’t “meant” for them.

      • Nougat
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        The googles tells me that Win2K was released Feb 17, 2000, and that ME was released Sep 14, 2000. Plenty of time for word to get out about how much better 2000 was than 9x even for home use.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          It was also a lot more expensive than Windows 9x/me, so most consumer desktops went that way. The only people running 2000 were professionals and nerds that weren’t running Linux.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Ah but in reality that wasn’t entirely the case, direct X compatible drivers were a big sticking point basically until XP came along. Windows 2000 was fantastic as a productivity OS, but it wasn’t fully there for the home user yet

          • Nougat
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I do recall that for some heavier (in 2000 lol) gaming, people stuck with 9x for a while longer, until better gaming support for 2K came around at least.

    • Nougat
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Oh sure - the intent was for it to be a business-centric OS, it definitely was not flashy, but it was just so much better than 9x that plenty of computer makers made it available, and lots of people chose it over 98SE.