@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agoThey dared to ask.mander.xyzmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1112
arrow-up1112imageThey dared to ask.mander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish15•7 months agoSo someone listened to at least 34h of porn-audio online for a paper? That’sa a clever way to get porn access at work. Tbf, a proper participant based study would have been much more innovative and provide better evidence. Even when only using 30 cases.
So someone listened to at least 34h of porn-audio online for a paper?
That’sa a clever way to get porn access at work.
Tbf, a proper participant based study would have been much more innovative and provide better evidence.
Even when only using 30 cases.