• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    71
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Yeah, and there’s a fair amount of money behind this push…which like…I’m not American, don’t live in the States, but my sister and her wife do…and I’ve gotta figure out how to get them the fuck out if things go Trump again…

    Edit: also, living in the UK I run into loads of people who go “Well, if Trump gets in again, that’s not really our problem…” but like…the USA makes they’re problems everyone’s problem. And another Trump presidential term would be a huge problem for the rest of the world…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      also, living in the UK

      Yeah, I’ve been following UK politics by way of TrashFuture podcast and I gotta say… your immigration plan is to deport people to Rwanda and your government just endorsed a Trans-Panic Committee to decide whether teenagers can consent to gender-affirming care.

      And these are the moderate Labour Party positions. Liz Truss wants to do worse.

      God damn, dude. Finding the worst people to run the country is not a competition. You can just let the Yanks have this one.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        107 months ago

        They look at our right wing propaganda machine to see what “works.” They also get the added “benefit” of our toxic sludge that is online political discourse to feed off of. They don’t need new issues as they have a repository of shit to pick from…

        Why does Americas #2 export need to be toxic right wing bullshit…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        57 months ago

        Finding the worst people to run the country is not a competition.

        I’m only here on a marriage visa, I’m not a P.R or citizen yet, so I’m not allowed to vote against having these bigots and con-men in power. Also, while labour is somewhat moderate, the Tories are in power, and they’re a bunch of fucking nut jobs. Labour can’t decide what they stand for anymore, which means they will stand for nothing, and the rest of the available parties will never get to power again. The available options are shit, just like in the States. And the Yanks think they invented having a shit government, but lemme tell you, the Brits have been fucking up their own government and foreign governments for a lot longer the the US has been a thing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          37 months ago

          As a yank who’s followed British politics for a while, I wouldn’t blame labour’s bullshit on the tories. They seem to have done the same thing in response to thatcher that the Dems did to Reagan “ok sure we can be the neutral centrist party, we’ll be conservative while you be regressive”. When I see actual left wing ideas coming out of the UK it’s either from your queer folks, a small and vulnerable actual left wing, or from the SNP. Even now with the tories wildly unpopular Labour seems to be taking the attitude of “we should reach across the aisle and offer to do what they propose”.

          But you are right we learned how to govern from two sources, you and the Iroquois confederacy, and the Iroquois functioned (they still do, but they did then too).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            you and the Iroquois

            Yeah, I’m Canadian buddy.

            Edit: I’m not disagreeing with anything you said, just to tired to formulate a proper response, might come back to this tomorrow.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          In a similar situation here in NZ. On a perm resident visa through partnership, can’t vote, keenly interested in being on my best behaviour here. Labour wasn’t amazeballs, but the current coalition is like watching a pack of dogs with diarrhoea tear through a quiet town. You just know it’ll be on someone else to clean up after them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          17 months ago

          https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/04/24/labour-could-keep-sunaks-rwanda-policy-successful/

          Baroness Jenny Chapman, a frontbencher who was Sir Keir’s political secretary, was asked whether Labour would axe the scheme if 10,000 migrants had been flown to Rwanda by the time of the election.

          The peer, who was a member of the shadow cabinet, replied: “If it did, as a major major leap with a thought experiment, then we might be having a different conversation but there is absolutely no evidence this is going to work.”

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  17 months ago

                  It was explicitly a hypothetical thought experiment

                  By the presumed future minister in charge. If boat crossings to the UK fall following implementation of Rwanda deportations (more a gamble than a hypothetical) they’ll continue the program.

                  Starmer has already said they wouldn’t go through with the Rwanda plan

                  Starmer’s shadow cabinet - including Yvette Cooper, shadow home secretary - have simply asserted the program is “too expensive”. That’s their sole opposition to the new rule. Not that they won’t go through with it, but that they don’t want to pay for it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      117 months ago

      The UK gets whatever the US gets, it just sometimes lags by a few years depending on how long it takes for the US to excrete it over here.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      Yeah we’ll take the uk and Canada down with us. Honestly probably the EU and we’ll try for Russia as well