• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    217 months ago

    You wildly overestimate the danger nuclear waste represents.

    First, transportation is done in small amounts at a time, completely encased in concrete and steel, and is of no risk of exploding: the only danger would be spillovers, which would call for expensive cleaning operations.

    Next, storage. The whole waste produced by 60 years of nuclear waste in France amounts to only a few swimming pools of dangerous material. If this material was actually fully useless, we could ditch it in geological layers underground where it would become soon unreachable and dispersed, posing no discernable danger for the upcoming few billion years.

    Furthermore, the only reason we don’t ditch this nuclear waste right now is that this material can still be useful for plenty of uses that are not yet economically viable, but could be in the long term, such as energy generation with low-yield reactors.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        97 months ago

        Note that they present the issue only as a financial problem rather than an actual threat to the environment or people.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 months ago

        Since your articles behind a paywall, I cannot read it. However, I can guarantee you as what you’re describing was in a barrel. It was low level waste. So likely a mixture of propellants or other chemicals that had been exposed to a reactor environment and then disposed of in a sealed barrel. High-Level nuclear waste is solid metallic-like substances that are encased in glass, steel and concrete. There’s nothing to explode.

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          47 months ago

          Not paywalled for me, but here you go-

          The dump, officially known as the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, was designed to place waste from nuclear weapons production since World War II into ancient salt beds, which engineers say will collapse around the waste and permanently seal it. The equivalent of 277,000 drums of radioactive waste is headed to the dump, according to federal documents.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The information you provided was not sufficient so I googled

            The suspect drums contain nitrates and cellulose, which are thought to have reacted to cause the explosion in February

            It was low level waste mostly americanum dissolved into the mixture of nitrates and cellulose. The barrel did not explode as much as the lid popped off.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 months ago

            WIPP is for low level transuranic waste from DOE projects, just FYI. Not super toxic stuff. They ship it in these super tough containers that they test by dropping on a spike and putting in a furnace. Wild to watch.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 months ago

            Waste from nuclear weapons is not the same as waste from commercial nuclear power plants.