• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48 months ago

    Tge system moves people around at the cost of some dying. That may not be your intention, but it’s what the system does.

    Not shutting down the system as soon as you realize it operates on blood means you’re ok with the amount of blood it’s consuming.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 months ago

      No, not at the cost of some dying. That just randomly happens. The same way anything happens while doing anything. Babies are born in airplanes. That does not mean that they are delivery rooms.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        Maybe you’ll understand it clearer like this: There are no side effects, their are only effects.

        Whatever something does is whatever it does, we have intentions with things but our intentions don’t determine reality. If a system has effects we do not like our only recourse is to change the system, we cannot convince it to be other than what it is.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          So then everythings purpose is to do everything. No matter how seldom sometime happens in connection with something, that is it’s purpose. What a useful definition.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            you understand that there’s a difference between causality and coincidence right?

            Chairs cause weakening of core muscles which can lead to injury, chairs are frequently found in buildings that catch fire however they are unrelated to the fires.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              28 months ago

              Not according to your definition. My childhood house burned down because of an electrical fire. So according to your logic, the purpose of electricity is to burn down homes. It’s absurd.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 months ago

                Yes, the system of electrifying houses is to enable widespread use of electrical devices at the cost of a few electrocutions and fires.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    38 months ago

                    I don’t know who we is here, by the blithe arrogance I’ll assume usa.

                    Presumably because people decided there were too many electrocutions and fires and so modified electrification of houses to reduce that? What do you think you’re point is? It’s not that people are gleefully throwing children into fires for their TVs, it’s just that stuff does what it does.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              The whole point of the previous examples was to verify this is the logic. Why are your examples now specially not affected? Why is the purpose of the chair not to weak for muscles?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                The chair is to enable comfort at the cost of weakness, but not house fires.

                you have appalling reading comprehension.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      Not shutting down the system as soon as you realize it operates on blood means you’re ok with the amount of blood it’s consuming.

      Sometimes it’s better than the alternative. Magical perfect systems don’t exist. You get the best one you can and then improve on it.