esp if you’re one of the devout ones who think they’ve been really good

  • TheKMAP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s relatively worse. If you have nothing you won’t be around to complain about it. But having a good life is totally better than simply not existing.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not relatively worse, it’s just objectively neutral. It cannot be relatively worse because it is not perceived or felt to be compared. It is just objectively neutral.

      • TheKMAP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Any positive number is objectively higher than zero or null

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is not zero or null, those are both conditions you perceive, it is the complete lack of perception and being. You cannot have lost anything if you no longer exist to perceive any loss.

          • TheKMAP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah that’s what null means dawg

            Look up that photo of zero vs null in the context of toilet paper