Hunter Biden’s lawyer filed an ethics complaint in the House of Representatives on Friday against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene for reaching a “new level of abhorrent behavior” after she displayed sexually explicit pictures of him during a hearing Wednesday.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Get her with the DC revenge porn law. It states very, very clearly, in the very first part of it, that what she didn’t did is illegal

    Here:

    (a) It shall be unlawful in the District of Columbia for a person to knowingly disclose one or more sexual images of another identified or identifiable person when:

    (1) The person depicted did not consent to the disclosure of the sexual image;

    • exohuman
      link
      fedilink
      2611 months ago

      Yes, that’s very cut and dry. She broke that law.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      Isn’t going to happen. People in power, especially Republicans, don’t get in trouble for anything.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -12311 months ago

      Except he very much did consent to disclosure by turning a drive and it’s content over to someone else

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8211 months ago

        That’s not how it works. It’s explicitly NOT how that works. That’s the entire reason revenge porn laws exist.

        What you are claiming, would be equivalent to sending a nude to someone and then them posting it online and because you consented in the first to send it to them they’re okay to repost it. That’s literally revenge porn.

        You numpty.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        I thought he lost that laptop and it was picked up by someone and shit was leaked from it.

        • @thepianistfroggollum
          link
          English
          2511 months ago

          How the data was obtained is irrelevant to it being illegal to distribute it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            611 months ago

            Thank you. Unless he consented to having it published then it’s still illegal regardless.