Yes Ai is a big scary boogyman, it’s coming for our jobs, our art, and our porn, but for the love of god, can we please stop making unsubstantiated claims about what is and isn’t AI generated?
This picture has been on the internet since at least October 2021, the text is clear, background objects have continuity behind the subject, the light/ shadows all track, and model appears to be as anatomicaly correct as any other human (no extra fingers, wierd collar bones/ shoulder blades, etc). I will concede that her skin is on the smoother side, which could be the result of image manipulation (ie a software filter), a byproduct of the image resolution/ compression, or just a good skincare routine. That said, being pretty and having smooth skin are incredibly weak grounds to classify an image as AI generated.
Also, here’s as close as I can get to a Source for now.
Yes Ai is a big scary boogyman, it’s coming for our jobs, our art, and our porn, but for the love of god, can we please stop making unsubstantiated claims about what is and isn’t AI generated?
This picture has been on the internet since at least October 2021, the text is clear, background objects have continuity behind the subject, the light/ shadows all track, and model appears to be as anatomicaly correct as any other human (no extra fingers, wierd collar bones/ shoulder blades, etc). I will concede that her skin is on the smoother side, which could be the result of image manipulation (ie a software filter), a byproduct of the image resolution/ compression, or just a good skincare routine. That said, being pretty and having smooth skin are incredibly weak grounds to classify an image as AI generated.
Also, here’s as close as I can get to a Source for now.
AI enhanced then, maybe. There are artefacts of AI generation, mainly on the left of the pictures. Look at the pompom, the tiles, the burger.