@[email protected] to Political [email protected] • 7 months agoOoflemmy.worldmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1565
arrow-up1565imageOoflemmy.world@[email protected] to Political [email protected] • 7 months agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-27 months ago Christians wouldn’t loan without interest, You used a double negative dawg… What you said was: Christians would loan with interest That might not be what you meant to type, but that’s what was typed. Or you could have said: since Christians wouldn’t loan because they couldn’t loan without interest,
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•7 months agoWhile that statement could be interpreted either way, I thought the context made it pretty clear what they meant
You used a double negative dawg…
What you said was:
That might not be what you meant to type, but that’s what was typed.
Or you could have said:
My bad. Thanks for the correction.
No worries
While that statement could be interpreted either way, I thought the context made it pretty clear what they meant