A controversial bill that would require all new cars to be fitted with AM radios looks set to become a law in the near future. Yesterday, Senator Edward Markey (D-Mass) revealed that the “AM Radio for Every Vehicle Act” now has the support of 60 US Senators, as well as 246 co-sponsors in the House of Representatives, making its passage an almost sure thing. Should that happen, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration would be required to ensure that all new cars sold in the US had AM radios at no extra cost.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    72 months ago

    What if, instead, we eventually phase out AM radio broadcasts and reclaim the frequency for other purposes?

    • Inductor
      link
      fedilink
      292 months ago

      AM Radio has an extremely important role in emergency broadcasting, because you can cover a whole continent using just 3-4 broadcasting stations, and it is so easy to demodulate, that you can build completely analog recievers that need no power source (they use the carrier wave as a power source). This also means that AM receivers are very cheap, so in a lot of developing countries the only broadcasts most people can afford, and will reach them are AM.

      I think we should keep AM radio around, at least for emergencies.

      Also, unfortunately, when HF bandwidth gets freed up, it mostly ends up going to companies that use it for high frequency trading, and not to things where it would benefit the public, like ham radio, or digital broadcasts.

    • Optional
      link
      fedilink
      112 months ago

      No.

      Enough analog broadcast spectrum has been destroyed for almost nothing.

      I still can hardly believe they wiped out broadcast tv signals for . . . What did they do it for again?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        I still can hardly believe they wiped out broadcast tv signals for . . . What did they do it for again?

        Wiped out what? I can still get OTA TV with an antenna.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        Yeah let’s keep flooding old noise into the airwaves rather than update just so you don’t have to acknowledge you’re getting older and the world is changing.

        Go use a 14.4 baud modem if you like obsolete communication protocols so much.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      My understanding is that the EU – higher density, more languages (so more radio stations that nearby people can’t use), more-congested radio spectrum – has done this, forced a switch to digital car radios, and has generally placed more weight on ways to acquire more usable bandwidth.

      The US, without the same level of pressure for the frequency spectrum, has placed a higher priority on not breaking compatibility, keeping existing devices continuing to function.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Audio_Broadcasting

      In the European Union, “the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) entered into force on 20 December 2018, with transposition into national legislation by Member States required by 21 December 2020. The Directive applies to all EU member states regardless of the status of DAB+ in each country. This means that since the end of 2020, across all EU countries, all radios in new cars must be capable of receiving and reproducing digital terrestrial radio.”