We’re past the line. We should already be pushing for alternatives. That changes nothing about the strategy of working with the actual possibilities that exist in front of us, today.
And if you really think it’s about the terrain, why don’t you take an accelerationist view and push for the terrain that heightens the contradictions soonest?
Because like both-siders, that’s a ridiculous and juvenile political take.
You know just as well as I do that those aren’t real possibilities.
Keep patting yourself on the back and pushing for Worse over Bad. I’m sure it feels great.
Removed by mod
Because you’re well aware that it isn’t possible for that to be the outcome of this election. Stop playing dumb and pretending otherwise.
Removed by mod
I think he’ll be at least as bad if not worse on those, and worse on countless other things.
I think its all about mitigating fallout from the only 2 available outcomes for who becomes president.
Removed by mod
You’re conflating things.
The fight should be happening regardless. The strategy should be to have that fight under the lesser evil of the 2 possible administrations.
Removed by mod
We’re past the line. We should already be pushing for alternatives. That changes nothing about the strategy of working with the actual possibilities that exist in front of us, today.
Because like both-siders, that’s a ridiculous and juvenile political take.