• Tick Dracy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17 months ago

    As someone who’s not following 🇺🇸 news, what does that (Hilary) part means?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 months ago

      There’s a conspiracy theory (not entirely without merit, but generally assumed to be baseless) that people with negative information about the Clintons end up dead suspiciously. Epstein was one such person, under this theory.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 months ago

        Why didn’t they kill Monica? This conspiracy theory is actual garbage.

        Both of the Clintons are garbage human beings who didn’t/don’t deserve to be in office (which is true of most politicians). Bill definitely coerced women into sex. But when the loudest critics of the Clintons are tinfoil loons, it takes all of the air out of the room.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          47 months ago

          That’s the biggest hole in the theory for me. If they’re willing to disappear people, there are a lot of people they seem to have missed.

          There’s a sort of counter theory that says that the Clintons themselves started the conspiracy theory as a way of putting all Clinton dissent under the heading of a conspiracy, and honestly I find that much more believable.

      • Tick Dracy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17 months ago

        Thanks for explaining.

        I never heard of that. and for the Eipstein, I always associated his info with powerful people, but not specifically with the Clintons ಠ_ಠ

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          Right, there are a lot of possible names to blame for Epstein for sure. Like I said, it’s a theory that’s largely considered to be baseless. The Clintons have a lot of faults, but I haven’t seen any indication that they’re into assassinations.