@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 7 months agoI respect people who don't like snaps, but Canonical will not abandon a successful projectslrpnk.netmessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1286
arrow-up1286imageI respect people who don't like snaps, but Canonical will not abandon a successful projectslrpnk.net@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 7 months agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink26•edit-27 months agoNix, guix, flatpak, and OSI images are all better “universal” packages managers on sheer technical merits while also not be a vendor locked proprietary solution. Snaps are worse than what Redhat is doing.
minus-squaredream_weasellinkfedilink6•7 months agoSheer* probably. Unless there a technical merit about cutting stuff.
minus-squaredream_weasellinkfedilink4•7 months agoNp. We programmer types gotta help each other keep docs sharp ;)
Nix, guix, flatpak, and OSI images are all better “universal” packages managers on sheer technical merits while also not be a vendor locked proprietary solution.
Snaps are worse than what Redhat is doing.
Sheer* probably. Unless there a technical merit about cutting stuff.
Thx!
Np. We programmer types gotta help each other keep docs sharp ;)
Also than*
MR accepted. Thx!