• BombOmOm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    What if instead the government took the equivalent amount of ownership and put them on the path to building EVs? GM could’ve been Tesla without the Musk issue.

    In 2009, $/kwh prices were astronomical. There is a reason the Model 3 didn’t exist until 2017. Trying to make that car back in 2009 would have been a catastrophically awful idea.

    You guys have to stop with these suicidal ideas.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 months ago

      The Tesla roadster was released in 2008, and electricity has always been cheaper than the equivalent in petrol.

      • DdCno1
        link
        fedilink
        52 months ago

        This user meant the price per kWh of battery capacity. The Tesla Roadster was little more than an expensive proof of concept that was vastly inferior compared to the Lotus Elise it was based on.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          And then the Model S came out, and while expensive was still a decent all round car. And I’m sure GM could’ve made it cheaper/better if they went that route.

          I think you’re suggesting that I’m proposing that GM would have needed to stop building ICE cars and switching to electric overnight, instead of transitioning as technology and economics allowed instead of what they did now, which was ignore the whole thing until Tesla got successful and playing catch up, first to Tesla, now to BYD.

      • BombOmOm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The US government forcing GM to make a $100,000 luxury EV in 2008/9 would have been so laughably bad I can’t put it into words. And yes, the $/kwh of batteries was terrible then, why do you think EVs were so damn expensive in 2009?