@[email protected] to [email protected] • 6 months agoA bit latelemmy.blahaj.zonemessage-square476fedilinkarrow-up11.19Kfile-text
arrow-up11.19KimageA bit latelemmy.blahaj.zone@[email protected] to [email protected] • 6 months agomessage-square476fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•edit-26 months agoIf it’s not gendered and is for everybody, that isn’t that just the original statement? That safety is for everybody? That seems rather circular. But I think I get what you’re saying. We focus on lifting up women, and everyone benefits.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•6 months agoyeah i see how my comment was a little confusing let me try to edit :p thanks for the good faith question tho
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•6 months agoHey no worries. More people should act in good faith in my opinion. We don’t even have to agree with everyone but we should have mutual respect for each other and want a better world.
If it’s not gendered and is for everybody, that isn’t that just the original statement? That safety is for everybody? That seems rather circular.
But I think I get what you’re saying. We focus on lifting up women, and everyone benefits.
yeah i see how my comment was a little confusing let me try to edit :p thanks for the good faith question tho
Hey no worries. More people should act in good faith in my opinion. We don’t even have to agree with everyone but we should have mutual respect for each other and want a better world.