Google is coming in for sharp criticism after video went viral of the Google Nest assistant refusing to answer basic questions about the Holocaust — but having no problem answer questions about the Nakba.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 months ago

      Pity we’ve spent the past generation or so destroying critical thinking skills and factchecks

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      Nah, I think the solution is simpler: multiple competing algorithms. Gaming one system is pretty easy, gaming 5 isn’t. So if a search company wants to always have the top results, they need to swap between a handful of good search algorithms to keep SEO hunters at bay.

      Hiring experts is certainly a good idea, but due to the sheer size of the internet, it’s not going to be feasible.

      As for the original discussion about censorship in search, I take it to mean intentional hiding or demotion of relevant results due to the content of those results. SEO spam isn’t relevant because it’s not what the customer is likely wanting, so hiding/demoting it doesn’t count as censorship imo.

    • JackGreenEarth
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      Censorship is simply intentionally limiting the information that someone else has available to them, and it is bad. Let them curate their own information, that’s fine, but they should have choice over what they see.