Ever seen someone doing their “unskilled job” all their life? It’s just fucking magic!

The truth is that capitalists hate skilled workers, because those workers have bargaining power. This is why they love the sort of automation which completely removes workers or thought from the equation, even if the ultimate solution is multiple times more expensive or less competent than before.

Nothing is more infuriating to a boss, than a worker that can talk back with experience.

  • db0OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    176 months ago

    The urgency or criticality of the job is not what makes it unskilled.

    One can argue that an unskilled supermarket employee can cause economic hardship, or even death (think food poisoning).

    There’s no such thing as an unskilled job.They all require training and in all of them you become better as you learn more about that skill. How you learn that skill, in practice or in theory is irrelevant.

    Likewise, the fact that some businesses are OK to eat economic losses in bad workers and turnover in order to keep the worker dis-empowered does not make the job “unskilled”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      116 months ago

      I agree that all jobs need some training, but I think the termology is the real enemy. Like yes a cashier needs training but is it comparable to what is considered “skilled labor/trades” like qualified electriction, plumbers, welders, engineers, etc?

      I think everyone should make a living wage and think the terminology is definitely used to oppress and divide but whenever I see these arguments it really feels like people don’t see a distinction between the amout of work/time it takes to be competent in these jobs.

      • db0OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        Yes, it’s absolutely comparable at the same years of experience in that role. Like every other job.

      • db0OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s bullshit. How many people can replace the CEOs who routinely drive companies to the ground? Millions. Why were programmers badly paid when they were women-dominated but well paid when it was men?

        Not a lot can easily “replace” the fast food worker who’s been flipping burgers for 20 years.

        This is is just apologia.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 months ago

          It doesn’t matter if you think CEO’s can be replaced easily. It matters what company boards think and it isn’t many people. Also who they are willing to replace. Most of the board members probably have a close relationship with the ceo. Not so the burger flipper.