• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 months ago

    This is some spicy historical revisionism, haha. Liberals sided with the fascists in Nazi Germany, not the other way around.

    Mind sharing some numbers?

    • mozz
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is some spicy historical revisionism, haha. Liberals sided with the fascists in Nazi Germany, not the other way around.

      Hm? Maybe I’m misunderstanding something. Here, look, I’ll cite my super professional research.

      • “The Social Democrats and Communists were bitterly divided and unable to formulate an effective solution: this gave the Nazis their opportunity”
      • “By now the SA had 400,000 members and its running street battles with the SPD and Communist paramilitaries (who also fought each other)”
      • “Under Comintern directives, the Communists maintained their policy of treating the Social Democrats as the main enemy, calling them ‘social fascists’, thereby splintering opposition to the Nazis.”
      • “Later, both the Social Democrats and the Communists accused each other of having facilitated Hitler’s rise to power by their unwillingness to compromise.”

      Etc etc and so on. I don’t think that there exists a far left in recognized US politics in the same way there was an official communist party in Germany. But I definitely see parallels between Lemmy leftists who don’t want to support the Democrats against Trump, and German Communists who wanted to pick fights with the SPD (and, sure, vice versa) instead of uniting with them against Hitler.

      The SPD, at least, united towards the end with the Center Party and the DVP to support Hindenburg for chancellor as a last attempt to stop Hitler, but by then it was sort of too late anyway; the main damage had already been done. Hindenburg’s death hastened the process of Hitler taking over, but it was pretty much in the cards one way or another from 1932 on.

      Are you talking about the SPD supporting Hindenburg as siding with the fascists? I think they only did that because the alternative would be Hitler. Or what do you mean?

      Mind sharing some numbers?

      Sure.

      • Incarceration rates in the US showing the 0.2% or lower rate up until 1980, and then the skyrocket to 0.683% by 2000
      • USSR population before and after the war
      • Gulag population figures; 1.5 million in 1940 means 0.7% of the USSR’s 194 million population, and 1.5-1.7 million dead out of 18 million total who passed through the system means almost 10% fatality rate for being imprisoned there
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        So the Social Democrats did side with the Nazis instead of leftists, got it.

        Thanks for the numbers, again though the vast majority of deaths were due to mass starvation during WWII aftet Ukraine was invaded by the Nazis.

        • mozz
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          So the Social Democrats did side with the Nazis instead of leftists, got it.

          What are you talking about?

            • mozz
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Rather than joining up with the leftists, they sided with the fascists

              They did battle with the fascists in the streets, and once the Nazis were clearly on the verge of seizing power, they allied with their enemies in government to get behind Hindenburg to try to stop it from happening.

              The “rather then joining up with the leftists” part of it is accurate. Of course, the converse is also true – rather than joining up with the SPD, the leftists did battle with the SPD, called the SPD the main enemy, and even as late as the presidental election in 1932, were still running their own candidate, splintering off 13.1% of the vote away from Hindenburg, meaning that Hindenburg squeaked into office on a weakened mandate and Hitler was the de facto man in charge even before Hindenburg’s death. And, all the while and after, the KPD kept insisting that it was all the SPD’s fault.

              It was the last election many of the far left people saw, since they died in the camps before the next election came, years and years later under allied occupation. It is of course impossible to know whether the ones who died in the camps still felt it was the SPD’s fault.

              If you live in the US, you might get a chance to see how this all operates firsthand, from inside whatever the modern version of the camps is. You can of course argue that it’s someone else’s fault, and they should have compromised with you, instead of the other way around. Who knows, there’s an argument that you’d be right (and that Biden shouldn’t have alienated all the anti-genocide people). Of course, if that happens, your argument of course won’t mean shit in terms of saving you (or saving any Palestinian population which is suffering ten times worse under Trump’s administration than it was under the one you’re currently criticizing, although your criticism has perfect validity.)

              I have spent as much time as I want to spend trying to talk sense into you.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                22 months ago

                The SPD was the KPDs biggest enemy because the SPD betrayed the revolution, laying the groundwork for fascism in the first place. The SPD broke the line.

                I agree with you, there’s a good chance I will end up in a US death camp. You already know I told you I plan on voting Biden, I just believe that unless we can overturn this system, within the next few presidencies this will happen regardless of party.

                I have spent as much time as I want to spend trying to talk sense into you.