@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 6 months agonear zeromander.xyzmessage-square82fedilinkarrow-up1732
arrow-up1732imagenear zeromander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 6 months agomessage-square82fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•6 months agoWhoa slow down there buddy. Proposing numbers before numbers like they are a given.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•6 months agoI’m not saying the numbers stop. But there are numbers where concepts like “closer to zero” or “number before [another number]” don’t apply. For example There is no sensible way to define a less-than for the complex numbers and thus they can’t be ordered.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•6 months agoWhat do you mean by independent? There is no more general and independent notion of ordering than a less-than operator. The article above oulines a mathematical proof that no such definition exists in a consistent way for the complex numbers.
Removed by mod
Whoa slow down there buddy. Proposing numbers before numbers like they are a given.
Removed by mod
I’m not saying the numbers stop. But there are numbers where concepts like “closer to zero” or “number before [another number]” don’t apply.
For example There is no sensible way to define a less-than for the complex numbers and thus they can’t be ordered.
Removed by mod
What do you mean by independent? There is no more general and independent notion of ordering than a less-than operator. The article above oulines a mathematical proof that no such definition exists in a consistent way for the complex numbers.