Is it really that confusing? If it had said there was a pot of gold the implication is clear that the person who reaches it will be rich. You ask “why a nude woman?” and the answer is simply because, just like being rich, desiring a sexual partner is a common desire.
Exactly, it’s the same joke regardless so why get bent out of shape over it?
Removed by mod
Is it really that confusing? If it had said there was a pot of gold the implication is clear that the person who reaches it will be rich. You ask “why a nude woman?” and the answer is simply because, just like being rich, desiring a sexual partner is a common desire.
A pot of gold explaining the rules to you about it ringing a bell would definitely be even more suspicious than a random naked woman.
Removed by mod
It’s a pot of gold. Obviously there’s a leprechaun involved who will be presenting the riddle.
Makes sense. But that would not make me less suspicious.
Removed by mod
I thought it implied an erection.
Removed by mod