• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    446 months ago

    It seems like I’m constantly finding bugs in businesses’ apps. Do they not have people test them?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      616 months ago

      They do, and they have a backlog of hundreds of issues to fix and they must prioritise then. If fixing a bug doesn’t make money, it’s not priority.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        I am steadfast that I will occasionally take some time and kill off some low hanging fruit. For me, its kind of like a break and lets me clear my head on the bigger issues.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          Even then, there are bugs that need multiple people (design, engineering, content, QA, etc) and are not something that can be fixed on a whim.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              16 months ago

              The problem is that what users consider low hanging fruit is often not, and what is low hanging fruit for devs, is invisible stuff that users don’t notice. The intersection is the tastiest low hanging fruit, but as such it’s also rare and easily picked by anyone.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                16 months ago

                I never said that users were involved in this. This is just grabbing some bugs off the queue that are simple to fix but have been deprioritized by project manager.

                But they do make the customer happy because they are the one that submitted the bug.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      326 months ago

      As someone in the dev team for a “business app”, we probably know about most or all of them, but they’re just not important enough for anyone in management to prioritize them as part of a sprint. It’s also possible no one has given us reproducible steps to make them happen, so we just straight up don’t know what to fix. Usually the former though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      146 months ago

      I would fix that bug but the complete rewrite that management has had me working on for the past two years will make it obsolete anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      26 months ago

      They usually do yes however it’s all about prioritization.

      You may have hundreds or thousands or open requests and issues.

      With tens of thousands of closed issues that were either not reproducible, not actually problems, or largely indecipherable.

      There’s usually a feature roadmap which is where most of the development money and time is spent. If it’s an older business application then certain bugs might easily take weeks to find, fix, test, validate, go through user acceptance, A/B test, and then deploy. But fixing is expensive work, so if the bug isn’t severe it’s usually deprioritized next to higher priority work.