Toes♀ to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agoWhat year is it?ani.socialmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up11.15K
arrow-up11.15KimageWhat year is it?ani.socialToes♀ to Science [email protected]English • 7 months agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•7 months agoNo they wouldn’t. They would say something similar BUT IN OLDE WORLDY EGYPTIAN.
minus-square✺roguetrick✺linkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-27 months ago59 BC is actually pretty close to coptic I’d bet for spoken language (though officially it wouldn’t be called coptic with consistent Greek script until the third century). At least in the sense that vulgar Latin was close to Italian.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-27 months agoYeah but Mrmule was talking at us in English, see?
No they wouldn’t. They would say something similar BUT IN OLDE WORLDY EGYPTIAN.
59 BC is actually pretty close to coptic I’d bet for spoken language (though officially it wouldn’t be called coptic with consistent Greek script until the third century). At least in the sense that vulgar Latin was close to Italian.
Yeah but Mrmule was talking at us in English, see?