• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    36 months ago

    I regret to inform you that gun control is not a panacea. I live in a country with strict gun control and we still get active shooters (albeit less often than the US). Part of the job of Police is to put themselves in harm’s way to stop those people. If they don’t, who will?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      If they don’t, who will?

      SWAT teams. People who are actually trained and specialized in this role.

      Regular cops shouldn’t be SWAT trained or that violent.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        It doesn’t make sense for every municipality to have a SWAT team. Uvalde has a population of 15,000 people. Do they really need a pseudo-army platoon on standby for these once-in-a-century events?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          They waited for SWAT anyway before doing anything in this situation.

          The main problem is that SWAT took too long after arriving before they did anything. But tiny ass underfunded minimally paid local cops did the best they could until SWAT arrived. I posit that cops are not supposed to go in vs threats that are armed to the level of assault rifles and body armor. The shooter in Uvalde qualified, its more firepower than cops are honestly equipped to deal with and that’s perfectly fine.

          I mean, cops getting outgunned by “somebody”. The real issue is the proliferation of high-power AR15 rifles in our society. But I don’t want cops marching around with full sized loaded rifles on a day-to-day basis. Nor do I want to pay for (or pay the psychological costs associated with) the training to use those weapons.