@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agoPlacebozmander.xyzmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up11.12K
arrow-up11.12KimagePlacebozmander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish14•1 month agoYeah, I haven’t read the study of course. Only read about it. Which makes the claim above even more dubious. But hey, this is the future, who has the time to fact check anymore?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish9•1 month agoIf you only read about it that gives it 50% chance at best at being true. Luckily I also read about it, so together that makes it 100% true.
minus-squareTJA!linkfedilinkEnglish8•1 month agoYou could ask an AI, maybe they’ll invent a source for you
Yeah, I haven’t read the study of course. Only read about it. Which makes the claim above even more dubious. But hey, this is the future, who has the time to fact check anymore?
If you only read about it that gives it 50% chance at best at being true. Luckily I also read about it, so together that makes it 100% true.
Math checks out.
You could ask an AI, maybe they’ll invent a source for you