• athos77
      link
      fedilink
      131 month ago

      Sadly, no:

      Bakers, bakeries and bakers shops were required by law only to sell their ‘national loaves’ when they were a day old because stale bread did not cut to waste like fresh bread. Source

      [If you can find it, the BBC Timeshift episode ‘Bread: A Loaf Affair’ mentions this along with a surprisingly interesting modern-ish history of bread in the UK. It’s narrated by Tom Baker.]

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            Bing AI gave me this: "The phrase “did not cut to waste” in the context of bread rationing during wartime refers to the idea that stale bread, being firmer and less crumbly than fresh bread, could be sliced more thinly and evenly without falling apart or producing excess crumbs. "

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          According to the Oxford English Dictionary, it means to cut in a wasteful manner, particularly in terms of fabric. From elsewhere, it looks like it’s also used in construction in regards to cutting material such that the remaining sections are not usable for other purposes.

          However, I’m not sure how stale bread discourages such cuts.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            Fresh bread tastes amazing. You overconsume by eating it by itself.

            Stale bread tastes… stale. You actually cut thin slices so you can top it with stuff that masks it.