• Granixo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    344 months ago

    It’s not even because it’s heavier, it’s because it’s way more dense.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      604 months ago

      It’s not density, it’s mass. A mass of 1kg compressed to the density of the Sun’s core would pull the Earth with just as much force as a 1kg ball of styrofoam.

      • rockerface 🇺🇦
        link
        fedilink
        English
        204 months ago

        And is the Sun was replaced with a black hole of the same mass, the Earth would just keep on rotating around it without issues, if slightly frozen

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          64 months ago

          Xkcd did a what if on a black hole moon (getting it to collapse into one may be impossible, but a black hole the mass of the moon is theoretically stable), and it has the same conclusion, except just slightly colder instead of slightly frozen. And by slightly, I mean almost imperceptible.

          https://what-if.xkcd.com/129/

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Just to add some formality to this, the original commenter might want to look up the shell theorem for classical mechanics and Birkhoff’s theorem for general relativity.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Heavy is a subjective term based on the force of gravity. You are heavier if we weigh you on the earth compared to if you are weighed on the moon.

        Your mass in those two examples is unchanged. The amount of mass you have is finite and not subjective like weight.

      • Granixo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14 months ago

        The feather clearly has a more aerodynamic shape, thus, it wouldn’t fall as fast as a sphere with the same weight.