• Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    19
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    When I said “why the fuck didn’t ‘oceans could be rough’ come up as a possibility to them” yesterday, I got a bunch of people defending the U.S. military over this.

    I’m curious if the defenders will come back into this thread.

    Edit: It’s been 10 hours, so I’m guessing the answer is no.

    • bluGill
      link
      fedilink
      66 months ago

      The US military should know this. They should be able to build piers like this while under active fire. This is one of the things we need for a world war style invasion (think WWII d-day)

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        26 months ago

        That’s what I said. I was told things like “they wanted to do this fast, so they had to do it this way” and “this was only meant to be temporary.”

        • bluGill
          link
          fedilink
          36 months ago

          Both are invalid - sure it needs to be fast - which is why they should practice this. Temporary means they plan to pick it up after practice. They should do yearly drills in different parts of the world (obviously with permission of the host country) just to prove they can.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            46 months ago

            There’s literally no reason I can think of to build a pier in the ocean without a strong storms contingency plan.

            • bluGill
              link
              fedilink
              26 months ago

              Exactly. Either you can tear it down before the storm hits (good weather prediction needed) then rebuild it fast afterwards; or you build it to withstand storms. I guess there is the just scrap it after every storm - but then you need to rebuild it fast and cheap which this wasn’t.