• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1016 months ago

    Open sourcing the falcon 9 software would almost definitely be a violation of ITAR… On second thought it would be fun to see him go to prison.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        486 months ago

        That’s like saying state secrets are protected under the 1st lol

        I don’t think it’s true

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            176 months ago

            While courts have ruled source code is first amendment protected. Your statement is still very very wrong. Just because it’s first amendment protected doesn’t mean it can’t be classified normally or made illegal to leak because of ITAR.

            But go leak some of the source code from XKeyscore or a schematic of a pair of GPNVG if you’d like to test our code classification and ITAR systems.

            • Possibly linux
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 months ago

              I’m not taking about sealing some government secrets. I’m taking about building a fun hobby project with some sort of targeting system. Think a small rocket that drops a payload or a water balloon launcher.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                66 months ago

                Okay but that has no relevance at all to what the comment you were replying to was about. Companies contracted by the government and DOD specifically to create rockets are guaranteed to be covered by ITAR. Meaning open sourcing them would be impossible, regardless of the first amendment or anything else.

                There’s a massive massive difference between the software for a DOD contracted rocket like SpaceX makes, and hobbyist rocketry.