• Flying SquidM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      Maybe if you were clearer about what you were saying, these “interpretations” wouldn’t be an issue.

      I’m not sure what the point of bringing up Hiroshima and Nagasaki to show that the U.S. is capable of crimes against humanity is when you aren’t saying that’s what the U.S. is going to do again.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I didn’t. you stated the names according to your understanding. I only stated the facts that have happened in the history, I don’t make statements of my assumptions about what could or would happen.

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 month ago

          I stated the names because this is about the U.S. and China.

          So you’re not talking about the U.S. committing a crime against humanity against China, you’re not even talking about the U.S. and China. You’re talking about something that has nothing to do with the topic in this thread and you’re antagonizing a moderator about it to boot. Did I get that right?

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 month ago

              That would be a violation of our civility rule. I would suggest you do not do so again.

              Now, please explain how your posts are on-topic for this thread if they are not about the U.S. or China.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 month ago

                My comments were specifically on U.S. and China. until you pick on “Hiroshima and Nagasaki” to divert it, in your interpretation of my statement.

                • Flying SquidM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  81 month ago

                  You have repeatedly talked about my interpretation. I have already asked you to explain the connection between Hiroshima and the current tensions between the U.S. and China and you refuse to do so. I’m looking at your post history and seeing a fair amount of trolling.

                  I think it would be best for us to end this conversation now, but I am going to be keeping an eye on you for both trolling and incivility in this community, since you apparently are not aware of the rules in our sidebar.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    31 month ago

                    As an example of how powerful it is to have a narrative edge in war. where a government can easily get away with a crime against humanity, without any consequences.

                    I did.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 month ago

            let me be more clear for you, I’m not talking about the U.S. committing a crime against humanity against China. If you follow my comments. you may notice, you’re imagining stuff in that regard. specifically, trying to corner me because your opinions differ based on your interpretation of my comment. this is my last time saying this again. CHILL OUT!

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 month ago

              Once again, please explain how your posts are on-topic for this thread if they are not about the U.S. or China.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 month ago

                My comments were specifically on U.S. and China. until you pick on “Hiroshima and Nagasaki” to divert it, in your interpretation of my statement.