• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1106 months ago

    “The Year Of Linux on Desktops”. Been hearing this for decades, but it might actually be happening.

    Been hearing this for decades.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      486 months ago

      And it won’t ever be true until you can pick up a PC running Linux in a big box store. I could see the Steam Deck (and Valve’s rumoured upcoming console) to make a dent in the PC gaming space, but it won’t make a difference to the purchasing decisions of your your aunt who uses her pc to check her emails.

      Should corporate buyers ever get tired of MS’ shenanigans they might switch over to Ubuntu, but I’m not holding my breath for that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        At work, we have a strict ban on purchasing any laboratory equipment that requires Windows. After about a year, several of our suppliers have been pressured to offer Linux support, precisely because we don’t have time for windows shenanigans on a $100k piece of advanced benchtop hardware. We just got our first oscilloscope with Red Hat preinstalled.

        Also, regular people aren’t buying PCs as much as they used to. The PC is now a workplace and enthusiast device. Everyone else uses mobile.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          226 months ago

          The oldest version of Win I used was 95 about 2 years ago on chromatography machine (I think hplc or gas).

          It is to my knowledge still in use in the school because the software don’t run on newer machines. The teacher told me that he don’t know what will he do when it dies. It isn’t really an issue on Linux.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            146 months ago

            It might be worth trying it in Wine. It has great support for older software especially.

            Within the past year I have compiled new software for Windows 98.

            In a lab environment, it’s important to strictly control software versions and understand thoroughly what gets updated. We also want the ability to use the same version of software indefinitely if it meets our needs.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              116 months ago

              I think that there are more issues like archaic connectors and stuff like that. You can’t find new hardware with 30yo standard io.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            46 months ago

            O&G still uses a lot of old versions as well. I remember back in the Win 7 days when I had to set up a 95 virtual machine and register a bunch of DLLs by hand plus set up a fake A: drive because even the 95 version of the software was garbage. A friend of mine did something similar but he got it working on the Win 7 machine somehow. I never understood how, but he left a script behind at the company he worked for because it needed to be reinstalled every time someone did something stupid and he didn’t want to do it by hand.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          76 months ago

          We ship a $50k instrument product running Windows, and everyone hates it.

          As the only EE on staff, I got to spend a portion of covid soldering TPM chips to motherboards. Fun times.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            46 months ago

            Wow, that sounds painful. Not so much because it’s technically difficult, but ridiculous that you have to do that.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              46 months ago

              Yeah, they were tssop, so not hard. It was only necessary because the parts shortage crunch had the vendor shipping them without the chips installed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          66 months ago

          I find it unbelievable that anyone ever accepted lab equipment with a Windows requirement. I mean, I know it is true, but what the fuck? Glad your work is doing this.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            106 months ago

            I was not around at that time. Some of the systems I support are very long lived. At the time, having windows running on some of your equipment wasn’t seen as a liability. I guess you have to get bitten a few times before you understand that you need control of that system including the software.

        • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          several of our suppliers have been pressured to offer Linux support

          We just got our first oscilloscope with Red Hat preinstalled.

          This is so cool. Really great to hear. I wish more companies and other institutions would do this. They have to realize that using Microsoft software won’t benefit them in the long term, and actually start pressuring hardware vendors into pre-installing Linux.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Part of that job is supporting fielded hardware and ground systems, think like automated test or verification systems. I think we’ve learned our lesson that we can’t afford to have unserviceable software.

            At least with Linux and generally with an open source baseline, there is the option of throwing engineers at your problem because you have access to the code, and you can strip down the system to the bare minimum of what you need, and in doing so, really understand it. We don’t want to get into a situation where our hands are tied and we can’t fix it because the problem lies in the proprietary software while the vendor has long since abandoned any hope of support… grumble…

            • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              That kinda reminds me of my job, except that we build the unserviceable hardware and install Windows, as well as our proprietary software. Then we charge our customers shitloads of money for technical support. We’re a government contractor btw

              It’s actually a pretty nice company (from an employee standpoint), we use a lot of Linux internally, as well as other FOSS software. But porting our products to Linux is hopeless, we have decades of C++ code that either relies on Windows APIs directly, or on our custom libraries that rely on Windows-specific stuff.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 months ago

          Shit, the iPad pro is pretty damn close to a laptop these days with the keyboard and track pad (just lacking the OS). I had a conversation the other day where someone mentioned how OSX and Windows are locking down their OS’s to the point where it wouldn’t be farfetched to guess that many consumer devices will eventually use essentially a mobile device OS.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            56 months ago

            I had a conversation with a friend about iPads lately related to the „just lacking the OS“. The newer iPads with M-chips have all the computing power an average user could need but it’s crippled by the mobile-ish OS, so all the computing power is for nothing basically. An iPad running MacOS (with some adjustments for the Touchscreen) would be awesome. But we concluded it won’t happen anytime soon, because then basically no one would buy MacBooks anymore

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          The only regular people I can think of are gamers and my mom but I would like the idea of PC’s returning to techie and specialized use cases

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        276 months ago

        I’d argue the year of the Linux desktop passed years ago and now it’s just a saturation game. Most serious SW development is now on Linux laptops/desktops, Android owns the mobile space and versions are starting to make huge inroads in the laptop space. You can buy gaming systems running it trivially now.

        Conversely, casual users of windows are dying off, fewer non technical people are using desktops for anything at all. Only institutional users are buying Windows keys and they’re some of the easiest to get on Linux because of the cost savings, particularly if you run Linux server infrastructure, a fight we already won over a decade ago.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          156 months ago

          Most serious SW development is now on Linux laptops/desktops,

          I’d love a source for this. To my knowledge, most people that build to Linux hosts still use OSX.

      • TipRing
        link
        fedilink
        English
        14
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Thanks to the Steamdeck Linux users on Steam now outnumber Mac users. Still a tiny percentage of total Steam users but if developers increase support we will hopefully see that number take off.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          I loathe to be the BestBuy employee who sells a Linux box to a customer who only cares about the price difference.

        • BombOmOm
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Framework laptops also ship without Windows if you wish. Certainly nice to save the money for not purchasing an OS license I won’t use.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Your average Joe Schmoe probably has no idea that different operating systems on a given device are even a thing, they just see them as MacBox™, WindowsBox™, etc, they don’t see it as the blank hardware canvas we do. While I’ll agree it’s trivially easy to install Windows in the way you suggested, that’ll completely fly over the average user’s head.

              • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼
                link
                fedilink
                English
                26 months ago

                Your average Joe Schmoe probably has no idea that different operating systems

                But I don’t think that these are the people buying a Framework Laptop

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Duh, my bad man. Not my day for reading comprehension.

                  That said, should in the unlikely event Joe Schmoe buy a Framework, my above point could still be relevant.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        For me the hang up is still hardware compatibility and fuss factor. I still haven’t seen a windows app that will check all hardware and software and give a pain scale rating on what switching would involve. I have an Asus wifi 6 card, a stream deck, a Logitech trackball with Logitech customization software, a Logitech Webcam, a dygma keyboard running bazecor software. I’m sure there are some hidden headaches awaiting the transition. Once I finally get all that worked out, I will probably want to upgrade my surface and my ThinkPad as well and imagine even more headaches with these.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿
      link
      fedilink
      English
      156 months ago

      Decades ago it was a funny joke. Now it’s the most popular handheld OS on the planet by a huge margin. Linux is damn EVERYWHERE except the desktop now, and it’s only a matter of time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        56 months ago

        This is why (as per usual) Stallman was right: the “GNU/” part matters. Linux is already all over the desktop (or at least, the laptop) in schools, in the form of Chromebooks. That means the entire next generation is going to grow up using Linux.

        The only trouble is, it’s locked-down Google/Linux that they’re using, not GNU/Linux. All the freedom and user empowerment has been neatly excised from it such that it only facilitates consumption, not creativity.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          The only trouble is, it’s locked-down Google/Linux that they’re using, not GNU/Linux. All the freedom and user empowerment has been neatly excised from it such that it only facilitates consumption, not creativity.

          And within that frame, I’d be very surprised if it ever breaks out into the mainstream. Google brought android to the world as a vessel to make money. You very rarely hear about GNU in the wider world, outside of tech circles, being promoted to the masses as a viable alternative specifically because no one stands to profit from it, and they can’t have that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Been hearing this for decades.

      I’ve been hearing this about people hearing about people hearing that about Linux for decades.