Spotify is officially raising its Premium subscription rates in the US come July, following reports of the move in April. The platform is increasing its Individual plan from $11 to $12 monthly and its Duo plan from $15 to $17 monthly — the same jump as last year’s $1 and $2 price hikes, respectively. However, its Family plan is going up by a whopping $3, increasing from $17 to $20 monthly. The only subscribers getting a break are students, who will continue to pay $6 monthly.

Spotify announced the price hikes less than a year after its previous one last July. Before that, Spotify hadn’t raised its fees since launching a decade and a half ago. I guess it was too optimistic to hope the next increase would also take that long, especially with Spotify’s continued focus (and money dump) on audiobooks.

Premium subscribers should receive an email from Spotify in the next month detailing the price hike and providing a link to cancel their plan if they would prefer to do so. Users currently on a trial period for Spotify will get one month at $11 after it ends before being moved up to a $12 monthly fee.

  • Corroded
    link
    fedilink
    English
    357 months ago

    How does this compare to other music streaming services these days?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      437 months ago

      Tidal is $11/mo for an individual and $17 for a 6 person family plan. I recently switched because they supposedly give a better cut to artists and serve flac files.

      • Norgur
        link
        fedilink
        427 months ago

        Yeah. Never thought I’d see the day when Tidal was cheaper than crappy Spotify.

        • dinckel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          117 months ago

          If i wasn’t paying for a family play on Spotify, I would have resorted to music piracy at this point. The quality is still garbage, the service is getting worse, but the prices are only going up every half a year

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            157 months ago

            I tried sourcing my own music but man it’s a lot harder than movies and shows. Especially when you like to hear random recommended music how do you get enough

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              77 months ago

              Yeah - credit where it’s due, Spotify did a really good job with their music recommendation engine. It’s just that recently, they’ve started to get into the sad part of the enshittification cycle. I kinda saw the writing on the wall when they started forcing Joe Rogan podcast promos fucking everywhere, without having a config anywhere to disable podcast suggestions (which I don’t use through Spotify)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                37 months ago

                I’m surprised you’re only getting these now. My recommendations have been mostly garbage for the better part of a decade so all this praise for finding new music confuses me a little. Spotify has many feats, but the algorithm never was one for me, quite the opposite. I find it more annoying than helpful, actually.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  27 months ago

                  My beginning (about 6 years ago) was fine. Still miss the radio feature though.
                  They kinda brought it back but in a reverse form (former: 4 new 1 old, now: 5 old 1 new).
                  Playlist shuffle is atrocious but I am not picking them better any better.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 months ago

                  Oh I started getting them years ago. That’s when the first inkling of “this thing might be going downhill now” entered my mind.

            • dinckel
              link
              fedilink
              English
              37 months ago

              Feel you there. A lot of what i listen to are brand new bands, and finding sources for those is rough

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        Tidal is great but IIRC it either doesn’t support Amazon Echo or the integration is poorly implemented.

    • impure9435
      link
      fedilink
      207 months ago

      Apple Music only raised the price by $1 since the launch in 2015 (9 years ago). But they added cool features like lossless audio quality and Dolby Atmos. They also had lyrics like 6 years before Spotify added them. I think you can even get it for $6 dollars if you’re a student.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 months ago

          How does this work? Spotify has a deal with the music publishers, where they give 70 % of all subscription income to the music companies. The music companies (Sony, Warner, etc) then split the money based on the share of streams.

          How can Apple pay out 2.5x70 %, so 175 %? Are thes losing with every subscription?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            57 months ago

            Think of it not in terms of revenue percentages, but by payouts per song stream:

            Service Payout/song Plays to make $1
            Tidal Music $0.01284 78
            Apple Music $0.008 125
            Amazon Music $0.00402 249
            Spotify $0.00318 314
            YouTube Music $0.002 500
            Pandora $0.00133 752
            Deezer $0.0011 909

            So song for song, Apple is paying 2.5x what Spotify is (.008/.00318), and Tidal is paying out a whopping 4x what Spotify pays.

            Sauce: https://producerhive.com/music-marketing-tips/streaming-royalties-breakdown/

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              37 months ago

              That whole article is BS, they even say it themselves:

              Rates are rarely paid at a flat rate per stream

              There is no payout per stream. Instead a fixed percentage of the subscription price is shared among each streamed song. So why does Tidal pay more then? Either their subscriber numbers are still incorrect (they have a history of publishing way higher numbers than in reality), their subscriber listen to less music (which is the main reason Apple Music pays more per stream on paper, since its often bundled) or their audience focuses more on a single artist (or a genre).

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                37 months ago

                Sure. Obviously it’s more complex than that, but it helps illustrate where the math came from in the parent comment. I don’t know why Tidal pays more, but I’m hypothesizing its because most of their “co-owners” of Tidal are themselves, artists/musicians, which IMO is significantly better than the out of touch folks running Spotify.

    • yeehawOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      107 months ago

      I feel they’re all fairly similar. I won’t do apple music because I don’t do iOS, and I moved from Google play music when forced to the inferior YouTube music. I wonder if tidal or any other service has comparable pricing.

      • impure9435
        link
        fedilink
        107 months ago

        I’ve been using Apple Music on Android for years, I definitely recommend it. The app is totally fine, I think it’s still better than Spotify’s crappy app. On desktop you can use the Cider app, which is much better than iTunes. It’s even available on Linux.

        • rustydomino
          link
          fedilink
          English
          57 months ago

          There is an official Apple Music desktop app for windows now, no need to use Cider.

        • Midnight Wolf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          I switched to AM a couple years ago due to the (better) privacy policy vs YTM. The app is ‘fine’ but it’s painfully obvious that they didn’t want to bother with the android UI guidelines. But it’s a small annoyance, and the price is… palatable, I guess? I think I’d jump ship at $14, but at $12, fine. I don’t use it that much.

          Actually, it’d be nice if they would charge based on usage, not flat-rate. I doubt I’m using $3 of that $12 cost.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        I use YT Music because I get it cheap (VPN shenanigans), you can upload your own music (hello Nintendo soundtracks), and I mod the Android app to stop it being a mess (ReVanced Extended is the GOAT).

        • yeehawOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Do you always have to have the VPN connected to get the cheaper rate?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 months ago

            Nah just when I bought it. I did this a while ago so I’m not sure if it still works.

            I’m gonna cling onto the quid a month rate for dear life.

    • @cas919
      link
      English
      57 months ago

      I use Apple Music, primarily because I need to pay for the higher tiers iCloud storage for my wife’s photo addiction and it’s basically “free” for the family plan.

      If I didn’t already have the higher tier iCloud, I would probably prefer tidal for higher quality, or Spotify for the more diverse library.

    • kn0wmad1c
      link
      fedilink
      English
      37 months ago

      I use YouTube Music and it’s pretty good, but the best feature is no more youtube ads.