• @aubeynarf
    link
    236 months ago

    if it prohibits voluntary cooperation, probably ok. Involuntary cooperation (subpoena, etc) is compelled no matter what you signed - but I am not sure if an NDA prohibiting it is unlawful. (Though it’s definitely unenforceable)

    • a lil bee 🐝
      link
      fedilink
      156 months ago

      Even voluntary cooperation being okay is pretty wild, conceptually. What possible purpose could that serve but covering up crimes?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        196 months ago

        Suppose you work for an email provider and you agree not to talk to law enforcement about your customers’ data without a subpoena. Seems pretty legit to me.

        • lemmyng
          link
          fedilink
          English
          76 months ago

          I imaging that this scenario would be regulated by data protection laws and contracts, not by NDAs.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          If that communication was about a user talking at being at a cafe on a certain day and law enforcement knew that a murder went down at that cafe, then I think it’s enforceable, probably. If you’re reading your server logs and see (and believe genuine) an email arranging a murder then your employer couldn’t restrict you from reporting it to law enforcement.

          You can’t be compelled to criminal activity by a contract and nor can you be prevented from reporting criminal activity by a contract. Trump could get everyone in Trump tower to sign whatever contract he wanted but if he sexually assaulted someone in the lobby he’d have no legal grounds to prevent someone from reporting it to the police.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          Does that imply that the NDA would spell out what they weren’t supposed to talk to the police about, like customer records or something like that?

          A blanket ban on speaking with the police would be pretty broad and likely stifle reporting of illegal activities.