• Captain Aggravated
    link
    fedilink
    English
    526 months ago

    It is my understanding a lot of people maintain their unhealthy relationship with Windows as a prerequisite for keeping their unhealthy relationship with Adobe.

    To be fair, the FOSS community in this area has categorically failed. GIMP’s mission statement is 1. be hateful to use and 2. be capable of editing photographs I guess. Inkscape can’t support CMYK colorspaces so just forget it if there’s an outside chance if it’s going to be printed, Krita can’t draw a circle, Pinta crashes every other thing…hell I wonder if Adobe pays the GIMP team to keep it unusable.

    • ChaoticNeutralCzech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      216 months ago

      GIMP’s mission statement is 1. be hateful to use

      It hurts to say but you’re right. I was like “can’t you remap the right mouse button to another tool? Everything in the context menu is in the Menu bar regardless” and they responded with “nope, design philosophy”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      yep. I feel like FOSS projects are always made by code monkeys who have no design sensibilities and designers do not touch any of these. a lot of them are not only unusable but uninstallable by the majority of the intended user base. whenever i find something i want to use it’s like:

      —cool software. can i double click on an icon and have it ready to use?
      —umm, don’t be ridiculous, normie. you gotta self host it and use the command line to enter some arcane incantations obviously. alternatively you can use these other methods you’ve never heard of. if you need any help you can refer to their respective indecipherable documentation.
      —ok I’ll keep what i have until i find something that’s made for regular human beings, thanks.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        116 months ago

        A lot of open source graphics software is made by programmers who also need to edit images sometimes. Both the lack of UI polish and featureset choices make more sense when looked at from that angle.

        However, a lot of the criticism that gets thrown at these programs is also a bit unfounded. I regularly see people dunking on GIMP for not being a pixel-perfect clone of Photoshop for free. There is more than one way to design an image editor, and inability of some to learn another is really a user issue. GIMP could be better, but it still can and should be GIMP.

        • Captain Aggravated
          link
          fedilink
          English
          56 months ago

          GIMP has a well deserved reputation for responding to “this is not nice to use” with “Good!” There are lots of ways to design image editors, sure. Many of those ways are awful.

          Blender used to suck, too. Then they made a decision to improve. Which GIMP is bound and determined not to do. So it needs to go in the box with HURD and someone needs to do better from scratch.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          The last time I used pjotoshop was on a relatively new Mac II. I’ve also never had issues with Gimp for some reason.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Martin Owens is working on CMYK support for Inkscape as we speak, and Gimp releases v3 during the summer if all goes well. Still, they’re small projects with very limited funding. Help them !

    • arthurpizza
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 months ago

      I use these tools everyday. Yes there are limitations, but for what MOST people need there are solutions. It just depends on what is important to you. Also, you can use the ellipse assistant.