Bob to Lemmy [email protected]English • 6 months agoEveryday, as an Americanmidwest.socialmessage-square315fedilinkarrow-up11.29K
arrow-up11.29KimageEveryday, as an Americanmidwest.socialBob to Lemmy [email protected]English • 6 months agomessage-square315fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•6 months agoSome ISO8601 formats are good, but some are unreadable (like 20240607T054831Z for date and time).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•6 months agoThe ones without separators tend to be for server/client exchange though.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•6 months agoI agree but they’re hard to read at a glance when debugging and there’s lots of them :) Having said that, a lot of client-server communications use Unix timestamps though, which are even harder to read at a glance.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-26 months agoAt least it’s human readable and not protobuf 😬 * though the transport channel doesn’t really matter it could be formatted this way anyhow.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•6 months agoI mean I like this one without the separations
Some ISO8601 formats are good, but some are unreadable (like 20240607T054831Z for date and time).
The ones without separators tend to be for server/client exchange though.
I agree but they’re hard to read at a glance when debugging and there’s lots of them :)
Having said that, a lot of client-server communications use Unix timestamps though, which are even harder to read at a glance.
At least it’s human readable and not protobuf 😬 * though the transport channel doesn’t really matter it could be formatted this way anyhow.
I mean I like this one without the separations