• MushuChupacabra
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2226 months ago

    For those of you contemplating ways of covering up the ads:

    This is the same airline that beat the shit out of that doctor because the airline overbooked the flight. For your own safety, do not cross this airline.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      546 months ago

      The Chicago Department of Aviation did that. The same way if the police ends up killing someone, it was not the person calling the police.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        United was booting passengers to make room for employee transfers though, the situation was shit before dept of aviation even got the call.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            106 months ago

            If United couldn’t get anybody to bite at the vouchers, then the employees should have stood the whole flight.

            Yeah, that is not a solution. The FAA is salivating at the thought of this. Everyone must have a seat for takeoff and landing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 months ago

          Sure, but telling someone to leave their plane for some oddball reason is “only bad” not outright crazy like what happened then.

      • @leftzero
        link
        English
        106 months ago

        it was not the person calling the police.

        At this point anyone calling the police in the US is a necessary accomplice, and guilty of conspiracy to commit murder, aggravated battery, and probably several other crimes.

      • SkaveRat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        476 months ago

        he wasn’t white, so they didn’t assume he was a doctor

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      196 months ago

      I got screeched at for covering up a super bright blinking light on a red eye. Their FAs are next level stupid.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          856 months ago

          “The incident is widely characterized by critics as an example of mishandled customer service.”

          Made me laugh, that’s putting it lightly…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            166 months ago

            “The incident is widely characterized by critics as an example of mishandled manhandled customer service.”

            Just a typo.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          196 months ago

          Holy shit what a ride that was.

          It’s clear from a lot of stories like this (severe customer mistreatment) that United employees are miserable people who hate their jobs but this is nuts. I hope Dr. Dao got a huge settlement from United.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            106 months ago

            Is United Express actually United? I thought those tended to be a regional carrier using the name under license.

            I’d expect the labour friction to be still worse; I was peripherally involved with such a firm 20 years ago and know they had terrible problems with staff retention, mostly because they wouldn’t pay enough to retain people after they got fed up with the free-standby-flight privileges.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 months ago

          Wow. Even Trump thought they went too far. Damn.

          And the CEO who brushed that assault off ‘suffered’ a ‘delayed promotion’. Poor thing. For saying that stuff about anyone, let alone a customer, he should have been fired, no golden parachute.

          I think the doctor’s patients should have sued the airline too, since no doubt having their doctor pounded to a pulp caused them to miss their appointments.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        “If you don’t like it don’t fly”

        Seriously just shut up.

        Edit: LMAO just saw your other comment where you actually said this sincerely. You’re a parody of yourself.

      • Drusas
        link
        fedilink
        296 months ago

        Have you ever turned a screen off on one of these planes? They turn back on. So you turn them off again. Sooner or later, they turn back on. And repeat.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            206 months ago

            People like you constantly give corporations an inch because “it’s not a big deal” and here we are.

          • Drusas
            link
            fedilink
            176 months ago

            I don’t think you’re being beaten up for it. I certainly am not beating you up for it. But usually, yeah, the screen does come back on during the flight. I think they turn it back on automatically every time there’s an announcement. As somebody who finds screens like that very distracting and even migraine-inducing (the “busyness” of that sort of thing is a big trigger), it’s really frustrating.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            56 months ago

            Depends on the plane and system it has. Last United flight I was on it stayed off the entire flight. I use my phone and generally don’t look at it anyway but it was nicer I suppose.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 months ago

            I honestly couldn’t care less how many adverts they show me, they can have a constant stream of adverts the whole flight if it means that some shitty corporation is paying a portion of my travel coats.

            People really need to grow up about stuff like this, if you don’t want adverts then pay for a premium service - I’m poor, I’ll accept the adverts.

            • wagoner
              link
              fedilink
              English
              96 months ago

              That money isn’t subsidizing your flight cost, it’s increasing corporate profits.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              66 months ago

              Here’s the thing: companies have learned they can add ads to make additional money without passing any of that on to their customers.

              If you think you’re going to get a better rate for having ads, you’re fooling yourself. They’ll always charge as much as they can get people to pay and that amount isn’t affected by ads most of the time.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                15 months ago

                This is thinking based on emotion not reality, most of the internet is free because of adverts so your belief that it’s not used to lower prices is clearly silly. Yes companies love profit but they often increase profits by lowering prices to attract more business, it’s a perfectly valid business model to use adverts to reduce the cost to the customer and increase customer volume.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          36 months ago

          You can, there’s a button combo. It changes sometimes but if you spam a few things I can always black it out

          But that’s not the point, it still sucks

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      96 months ago

      Overbooking should be a mandatory minimum compensation of the greater of 1000x the ticket price or $20k. It’s a truly fucked up practice to disrespect people’s time like that.