• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1345 months ago

    We cannot have a fair debate without dedicated fact-checkers that pause the candidates and refute the lies from Trump (sure, and Biden if he does). Anything less is just letting him continue his strategy of spewing falsehoods faster than they can be corrected.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        395 months ago

        This is why there should be no audience at such things and the mic should go utterly dead when they violate the rules and/or it’s not their turn.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          185 months ago

          In saner times we didn’t need a law that prohibits a felon from becoming president or need a cut-off switch because psychopaths weren’t even in presidential debates.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          35 months ago

          and they’ll say “OMG they’re censoring trump because they can’t handle the truth deep state lizard people!!!oneone”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        235 months ago

        You’re right, he will regardless. Time to stop making decisions based on what his illogical cult believes…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        37
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        It’s very debatable if trump’s EO would have capped the price of Insulin or Epipens in a meaningful way - and its factually wrong that it was the same cap and legislation that Biden put into place.

        Trump’s EO meant that Federally Qualified Health Centers would have to offer Insulin and Epinephrine to “Low Income Individuals” without health insurance "at the discounted price paid by the FQHC grantee or sub-grantee under the 340B Prescription Drug Program” plus a “minimal” fee.

        From your own link, FQHCs already had a requirement to not charge anything to people in poverty, so “If ‘low income’ is defined as under 100% of poverty, this may not really change anything. Even if the income level is set somewhat higher, most patients likely would still have been protected by the sliding fee scale without this change”.

        This link, like your others, is from 2020. I don’t know how “low income” would actually have been defined since it wasn’t scheduled to come into place until Jan 22nd - during Biden’s administration.

        It’s true that Biden froze this - as others have mentioned in this thread, he put a 60 day freeze on all pending legislature when taking office, which is a fairly standard practice.

        Biden’s own Insulin cap was part of the Inflation Reduction Act, and capped the price of Insulin to $35 monthly for products covered by Medicare D.

        So yeah I concede that it’s an oversimplification to say that Trump did nothing and Biden did everything, but… the Insulin cap is Biden’s legislation. Trump did not cap Insulin or Epipen prices during his 4 years in office.

        • MacN'Cheezus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 months ago

          So Trump isn’t wrong then when he says Biden is taking credit for something he already did, is he.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            39
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Executive orders, like Trump’s insulin price cap, can easily be undone.

            Biden signed the IRA, which permanently capped insulin prices. So Trump is wrong when he says Biden “had NOTHING to do with it”.

            • MacN'Cheezus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              65 months ago

              Yes, it’s possible that Biden improved on Trump’s solution by making it an actual law rather than an EO.

              Either way, this is really just political posturing from both sides. Both of them are exaggerating their own achievements in order to dunk on their opponent when in reality, each of them just made incremental improvements.