• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    59
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m not using it because by and large it’s not implemented properly on consumer hardware, and my ISP doesn’t care if their IPv6 network is broken.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      386 months ago

      I’ve tried multiple times to go IP6 only. I mostly thought, despite my reasonable understanding of IP4, that I was the problem in trying to set it up. I found my dns host was being forgotten multiple times a day, set to something invalid, then it would time out and revert back to the working one. I couldn’t figure out how to connect two computers together for Minecraft.

      Now I hear it was just garbage consumer hardware and software? Fuck me. So much wasted time and effort to say nothing of believing I had turned into a tech idiot.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        You’re not an idiot. You’re using tools that don’t really do what they claim because it wasn’t considered an important use case.

        IPv6 is great, but we haven’t seen enough pain yet to really drive adoption on the home LAN.

        My solution uses the ISP box to deliver stateless auto conf, and bridging a consumer router. I can’t open ports but at least I get an IP.

        • Album
          link
          fedilink
          5
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Do you have an example? Because it works great on openwrt, dd-wrt, pfsense, opnsense, unifi, mikrotik…and then if you’re using the isp equipment it works out of the box.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            56 months ago

            You’re using open source third party firmware and higher end networking gear as an example. Of course they work. Shitty consumer grade brands aren’t in the same class

            • Album
              link
              fedilink
              36 months ago

              You think an asus, linksys, netgear,etc doesnt handle ipv6???

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                2
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                tplink handles it badly ootb, youd need openwrt/ddwrt.

                my isp’s modem cant handle it well either.

                i doubt older asus/linksys/etc devices handle it well either.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            TP-link can’t open ports in the v6 firewall neither can Linksys and it doesn’t support DHCP forward so literally was incompatible with my ISP implementation. Some current TP Link router sold at Walmart don’t even have an IPv6 firewall.

            Open source works great. Can’t speak to unifi never seen it for sale here.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      96 months ago

      That is not the case for every country though. In France and Germany for example almost 3/4 of google requests are via IPv6.

        • Redex
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          Interesting that India has such a high percentage. I’m guessing it’s because most of their network infrastructure is probably relatively new and so they can include support right off the bat, instead of having to retrofit stuff?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            Not much choise i guess. Usa and europe grabbed the majority of available ipv4 space. Asia got a bit. And only scraps and leftovers for africa and latin america.

            • Redex
              link
              fedilink
              16 months ago

              Yeah but then you look at China and it’s at 4%. Maybe they got into the game early enough to get enough adress space for it to be serviceable?